Jump to content

4V4 Map Vote Etc.


3 replies to this topic

#1 UnKnownPlayer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Fury
  • Fury
  • 266 posts

Posted 19 August 2016 - 05:08 AM

Could we please simplify the map vote whilst we are in 4v4, having domination etc. on when we are supposed to be testing a mechanic isnt helpful when one player stands in the circle and ends the round. Also, Polar Highlands? took me 5 minutes just to find the other assault mechs lumbering around :(

#2 Mechteric

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 7,308 posts
  • LocationRTP, NC

Posted 19 August 2016 - 05:34 AM

View PostUnKnownPlayer, on 19 August 2016 - 05:08 AM, said:

Could we please simplify the map vote whilst we are in 4v4, having domination etc. on when we are supposed to be testing a mechanic isnt helpful when one player stands in the circle and ends the round. Also, Polar Highlands? took me 5 minutes just to find the other assault mechs lumbering around Posted Image


Actually, maybe only having domination might be the better idea, that way at least people are more likely to converge in a battle area, versus randomly wandering the wastelands of Alpine and Polar for 10 minutes.

Edited by CapperDeluxe, 19 August 2016 - 05:34 AM.


#3 Davers

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,886 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationCanada

Posted 19 August 2016 - 05:58 AM

Hence why "We need much bigger maps" isn't as great an idea as it sounds. ;)

#4 C E Dwyer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,274 posts
  • LocationHiding in the periphery, from Bounty Hunters

Posted 19 August 2016 - 06:03 AM

Yes might be an idea to take some modes and maps out the cycle for the PTS if it's possible.

I have been though on the whole finding test firing on the training ground more useful, as some people seem to be playing this like the live servers rather than stress testing Power draw.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users